Amazon Book Depository B&N Goodreads
This post uses affiliate links and may receive a small commission for purchases made through my links at no additional cost to you. Click here for more info.
“Something has to change. In being robbed of our deaths, we are robbed of our lives.”
Suicide Club is a chilling tale of a near-future dystopia where population decline has led to strict Sanctity of Life laws and systems to extend life ever longer. Poetically written, Heng weaves a dystopian nightmare that is plausible; however, I struggled to connect to the story as I had expected to and was left wanting much more.
The novel takes place in a New York City that closely resembles modern day, which both adds to the fear of this potential reality as well as creates a dissonance between the futuristic technologies that are not really explained. There is a lot of jargon used that did not seem to be explained, which I found to be distracting – like DiamondSkin is something that I should be intimately aware of, or that a Tender is something that I personally understand.
Suicide Club is told in two alternating points of view, something that I didn’t realize right away. I found myself confusing backstories and just being confused until I went back and re-read. I love dual-POVs done well, but I struggle when the narrative shift isn’t clearly notated and the perspectives bleed together. The first 20% of the book or so recalls the back histories of the two main characters and I struggled keeping everything straight.
I found myself not really caring much about the characters in the beginning of the book, although by the end I did care a bit for Lea and Anja. For me, the story was lacking in explanation of what steps led the population to this point, the political Ministry and its purpose left largely unexplored. With comparisons to Margaret Atwood, I found this to be particularly disappointing as I find Atwood’s writing to be largely about the political systems as well as the system’s impact on the central characters. I can see what Heng was trying to emulate, but for me it missed the mark.
“Someone once said that death was the best invention life had to offer.”
In my opinion, the overall story would have been stronger if the beginning of the novel spent a bit of time directly exploring the political climate, explaining what it meant to be a lifer or antisanc, how the tests at birth and the numbers play into the scheme of things. I found a lot of compellingly interesting tidbits about society that weren’t explored. What is causing the population decline, what is the history of the Replacement business, why all the laws about taking care of yourself? Why the Lists and WeCovery? In a world where suicide is a sin and used as a form of civil disobedience, I feel that answering some of these questions would have strengthened the narrative. I found the lack of worldbuilding in a near-future dystopia to be the main reason that I struggled to connect with the story, and I was left wanting more.
I found Suicide Club to be an interesting and innovative premise, Heng writes with lyrical prose and I look forward to reading her future work and seeing her develop as a writer. This is more of a story about family and choice and less about the dystopian world. I think readers who are interested in family dynamics and the personal story of the characters will enjoy this book, but those who are looking for a dystopian thriller with political intrigue may be disappointed.
★★★☆☆
Thank you to NetGalley and the publisher, Henry Holt & Company, for providing me with an e-arc of this book in exchange for my honest review. You can find information about my rating criteria here.
I love you review!!! Although I do disagree about the politics. Given the overall theme, I felt the decision to omit them was what actually worked for me. But so much of this reflecting back, I can where you are coming from. You uses simple one liners to describe a lot of the jargon like Diamondskin, which for me was brilliant, but could honestly be missed easy I think. I always love seeing how we stack up with books 🖤
LikeLiked by 2 people
*She uses.. not You uses. Stupid phone 🤬
LikeLike
I definitely saw those one liners, but for me it wasn’t enough. I don’t know why, but I feel like not going more in depth felt disjointed from the future aspects? Like everything else but these words seemed so much like present day and without the politics I just wasn’t able to fully immerse myself. This is totally a preference though because I like the political aspects of dystopia, and I think that the book blurb doesn’t adequately describe what you are really getting here.. I think I had expectations that just couldn’t be met. But this was a good book and I think people will enjoy it provided they go in knowing what they are getting instead of expecting something in the vein of Atwood’s work.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, I totally get where you are coming from! And I do wish we would move away from Atwood comparisons. It needs to stop. It is like seeing the Night Circus on every MR title. I can see how you expected something more or different.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I requested this one on NG. Haven’t got the approval yet tho.
I really like dystopia and was really excited about this. I saw in other reviews as well that the world building is not so good.
The family dynamics part could still be interesting!
LikeLiked by 2 people
I think that as long as you go in with realistic expectations of what you are getting it would be a different experience, and the family dynamics were incredibly interesting for me! I hope you get a chance to read it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am reading this currently. It’s interesting, and can’t say it’s bad but not hooked me in enough..I am halfway but agree with world building. Thanks for the excellent review!
LikeLiked by 2 people
I definitely agree, I wanted a bit more in the case of worldbuilding. It is such a neat book and not bad… just didn’t captivate me. Thanks for commenting!
LikeLike
Pingback: Book Blogger Confessions ⋆ Book Tag ⋆ The Laughing Listener
Pingback: Anticipated Reads for July 2018 – Reader Voracious Blog
HMMMMMMMMMM it’s interesting but not interesting enough to make me put it up on my growing tbr. Lovely review though!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you so much! I definitely think that in the right hands it will be coveted, but it isn’t for everyone.
LikeLike
Pingback: Mid-Year Book Freakout Tag 2018 – Reader Voracious Blog
Great review!
I am currently reading this and I am struggling so much with it. I agree that the world, while interesting, could have used with some more worldbuilding.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you Hannah, and I am glad that I am not the only one wanting a bit more worldbuilding! I hope your next read is more your speed, love!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am still struggling my way through the book because I am determined to finish it. But I am also binge-reading the Kate Daniels series and everything else is taking a bit of a backseat..
LikeLiked by 1 person
You can do it… sooner or later! It does pick up a bit once you get through the slog of a backstory infodump so I hope it gets easier for you.
LikeLiked by 1 person
gotta go read this now. curious of what looking what others thought. thanks for review
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for commenting and I hope you enjoy it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I did. I hope you continue to write
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: June in Review – Reader Voracious Blog